The biggest United States technology companies generated record amounts of cash in the first nine months of 2026, yet they returned the smallest share of it to shareholders in at least 15 years. Surging spending on artificial intelligence infrastructure squeezed share buybacks first, leaving investors with a new bargain: less cash today, for a bet that huge data-centre spending will eventually pay off.
The numbers behind the shift
Microsoft, Alphabet, Amazon, Meta and Oracle together returned just 9.3% of the cash their businesses generated as dividends and buybacks in the first three quarters of 2026, down from 27.4% a year earlier. That finding comes from a Reuters analysis of LSEG data and company financial reports, and it marks a sharp break with recent years.
Operating cash flow actually rose 29% from a year earlier to a record $542.9 billion, so weaker businesses did not cause the retreat. Capital spending, driven by the artificial intelligence boom, doubled to $556.9 billion over the same nine months, exceeding the cash the five firms generated for the first time in data going back to 2011.
That spending left the group with a combined free cash flow deficit of $14 billion, against a surplus of $143.5 billion a year earlier. In other words, the companies spent more than they earned, before returning anything to shareholders at all, and the gap was filled by reserves, borrowing and share sales.
Buybacks took the hit first
The squeeze hit buybacks hardest. The five companies cut repurchases by 83% to $13.6 billion, from $81.8 billion a year earlier, while dividends rose to $37 billion from $33.9 billion. Dividends are treated as a commitment that is hard to cut, while buybacks are flexible by design, so they were the first thing to go.
With combined free cash flow negative, the five companies’ $50.6 billion in payouts was effectively funded from cash reserves, borrowing or share sales, rather than from earnings after capital spending. Alphabet raised $29 billion from debt, while Amazon raised $48.1 billion in the third quarter, as our Microsoft bond sale report shows for Microsoft’s own borrowing.
Who stopped buying back
Alphabet and Meta have not repurchased a share in 2026, after buying back $66.5 billion in the first nine months of last year. Amazon pays no dividend and has not bought back shares since 2022. Microsoft accounted for nearly all of the repurchases, yet it cut buybacks to $4.4 billion in the September quarter, from $5.7 billion a year earlier.
Amazon’s capital spending of $75.9 billion in the third quarter was almost 80% more than the $42.4 billion its operations generated, and it still expects about $220 billion of spending this year. The contrast with earlier years is stark: the same five firms returned $81.8 billion through buybacks alone a year earlier.
Meta has likewise signalled further increases after a quarter in which a large legal charge and a bigger AI bill squeezed profit, as our Meta earnings report detailed. The other companies have also signalled that spending will keep rising, leaving little room for buybacks to return soon.
Why the loss of buybacks matters
The loss of buybacks matters more than the dollar figures suggest, because buybacks have flattered per-share earnings for years. When companies buy back and retire shares, profits are spread across fewer shares, lifting earnings per share even when total profits do not grow. That support is now largely gone.
Alphabet reduced its share count by 9.5% between the end of 2020 and 2025 through buybacks, according to ING, providing a boost of roughly 2% a year to earnings per share. Without that boost, per-share earnings must come from actual profit growth, a harder test that arrives just as depreciation charges on new data centres start to rise.
Investors care far more about earnings per share than about free cash flow, according to a JPMorgan technology specialist. Technology and communication services stocks delivered a shareholder yield of just 0.28% in July, against 1.99% for the rest of the market, according to MSCI, showing how far the sector has fallen behind on cash returns.
Why It Matters
The shift matters because buybacks have been a quiet pillar of technology share prices for 15 years. Investors came to count on that support, and if it is gone, share prices must stand on profit growth alone, at a time when AI returns remain uncertain and markets are already nervous.
There is also a wider signal in the new bargain. As Franklin Templeton’s Ehren Stanhope put it, the current regime may increasingly be characterised by greater equity and debt issuance, a request of capital from investors, rather than a return of it. That turns the most cash-rich companies into net askers for money.
Background
Buybacks became central to big technology finance after the companies built up large cash reserves, and they were long treated as a sign of discipline. The 2026 figures show that logic breaking under AI infrastructure spending, with no end in sight in company guidance. Whether the bet pays off will be judged in earnings reports over the next few years.
0 Comments