Tuesday’s midterm elections turned anger over AI data centers into a political force. Voters in several states backed bans and elected candidates who campaigned against the buildout, while exit polls showed most voters worry AI will do more harm than good and oppose data centers near their homes. With Democrats now in control of Congress, the industry faces a real prospect it has never faced before: a nationwide moratorium on new data centers, and laws forcing builders to pay their own power costs.
What voters actually said
An NBC exit poll showed how deep the concern runs. More than half of respondents believe AI will do more harm than good, while almost 80% are against the building of data centers in their neighborhoods. Almost 60% said data centers were a crucial or major factor in their vote.
Ohio felt the backlash hardest. An Ohio county where Meta had planned a 700,000-square-foot facility just passed a ban on data centers, and local communities across the state overwhelmingly voted against buildout measures. Ohio voters had already told data centers to get out on election day.
OpenAI has eyed a $500 billion data center in the state, backed by more than $100 billion in financing from Nvidia, according to TechCrunch. Analysts at Morgan Stanley predict Democratic governor-elect Amy Acton will also pose a major risk to Ohio’s data center buildout.
The pattern repeated beyond Ohio. Candidates in Texas, Maine, Michigan, Nevada, Georgia and South Carolina all won seats after taking a stance against the rapid buildout. “It is clear that money does not buy outcomes,” said Anshi Bhatt, a tech and policy researcher.
The industry’s spending told the same story. AI-linked groups spent tens of millions on the midterms and mostly lost where it counted, while candidates who campaigned for tougher AI rules won or led in several of the cycle’s most watched races.
What Congress may do next
Democratic control of Congress could improve the odds for bills that were going nowhere before the election. One, introduced earlier this year by Senator Bernie Sanders and Representative Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez, proposes a nationwide moratorium on new data centers until Congress adds new guardrails.
The moratorium would last until the buildout stops raising electricity costs, harming the environment or proceeding without community approval. Any such bill would also face a possible veto. Another bill, the GRID Savings Act from New Mexico Senator Martin Heinrich, would prevent grid infrastructure costs from being passed on to communities.
Likely next steps include more construction moratoriums or requiring data centers to pay for their own power grid upgrades instead of passing those costs on to nearby communities. Goldman Sachs predicts data center construction delays in states like Georgia and Texas because of Democratic gains.
Our read: the fight moves from town halls to Washington
The backlash is bottom-up, bipartisan and personal. One private equity executive told TechCrunch that people do not necessarily hate data centers, but rather AI, and that data centers have become a stand-in for people’s fears about the technology. Maia Woluchem of Data & Society said the results point to a real frustration with tech power.
The grievances are concrete. Amazon built a data center in Gilroy, California, without many residents knowing, by satisfying a 45-year-old zoning law. Vague or outdated zoning laws, along with requirements that local officials sign nondisclosure agreements, have only fueled outrage over new projects.
Data centers have also received billions in tax breaks, and although companies touted jobs and community programs, for many people that simply was not enough. Nadine Smith of Color of Change said families should never be subsidizing the richest corporations in history through their utility bills.
The environment is the sharpest edge. In South Memphis, families breathe exhaust from the gas turbines powering xAI’s supercomputer, and the same turbines are used at data centers throughout Virginia, known as the world capital of data centers. xAI’s Memphis site already faces lawsuits over its turbines.
Texas shows how far the politics have traveled. Governor-elect Gina Hinojosa supports a statewide moratorium on data centers, and both she and Governor Greg Abbott called for some limits. Hinojosa centered much of her campaign on opposing data centers, a notable choice in a state whose electrical grid has proved vulnerable.
Smith expects a fight, or even more executive orders, to bypass what Congress is now likely to block. Even among Democrats, a blanket freeze is contested, with some worrying that a moratorium could slow AI progress and hurt national security. The industry’s lobbyists are about to start calling lawmakers.
Why It Matters
The buildout’s political license is now the binding constraint, not chips or capital. If Congress or the states slow construction, the AI industry’s growth plans, and the giant financings behind them, get repriced. The industry’s counter is that a freeze would slow AI progress and hurt national security, a worry even some Democrats share.
Background
The election had already rewritten the industry’s data-center map before the new polling landed, with towns and states weighing limits on new facilities and power deals. The question now is whether the backlash stays local, with bans and moratoriums town by town, or becomes national law.
Source: TechCrunch’s midterm analysis
0 Comments