Voters in at least 14 Ohio municipalities have said no to the AI buildout, approving bans or new restrictions on data centers in elections held November 3. Ohio put 21 data-center measures before voters in 18 municipalities, more than any other state, and the results ran overwhelmingly against the projects. The votes covered outright bans on large facilities, new voter-approval rules, and financial guarantees from developers seeking tax breaks. All results remain unofficial until county boards certify them.
What the votes did
The bans mostly target large facilities, defined in several charters as sites drawing more than 25 megawatts of power. That threshold sits far below the scale of a hyperscale AI campus, so a ban at that level rules such projects out regardless of land or grid access.
Trenton, Sunbury, Piqua, Pataskala, Granville, Hubbard, Urbana, Defiance, Upper Sandusky, Conneaut and Oregon all passed outright bans. Other towns chose restrictions instead of bans on November 3, including voter-approval rules, zoning changes and financial guarantees for developers seeking tax breaks. Fortune’s tally puts the total at 14 or more municipalities.
Trenton and Piqua: the two watched votes
In Trenton, a town of about 14,000 in Butler County, almost 80 percent of voters passed Issue 17, which bans data centers using more than 25 megawatts of electricity. Debates over two proposed data centers in or bordering the town had consumed Trenton for months.
Residents opposed to the projects collected signatures to get the ban on the ballot. After the city council voted not to certify the petition in August, the Ohio Supreme Court intervened, finding the council had disregarded the law, and ordered the petition certified.
The vote creates an uncertain future for an Amazon Web Services data center planned for land just outside Trenton. The ban applies only within city limits, and the city withdrew an annexation petition for the project land in September. A neighboring township zoning commission passed a resolution in October to ban data centers, ahead of a November 10 county hearing.
Piqua drew the closest watch of any single town. Voters approved a charter amendment banning data centers with a peak load above 25 megawatts by about two votes to one, in a city divided over a planned Meta campus of about 607 acres.
Voters also recalled the mayor and two city commissioners. Whether the amendment stops the Meta project remains unclear, since the city had already signed development and utility agreements, and the county must certify the results by November 24, leaving the campus in limbo.
The other side
Not every voter in these towns wanted the bans. In Trenton, some residents argued they would bring jobs and revenue, and said the town should take the income rather than watch development go elsewhere. One resident told the Enquirer he believes the town needs the data centers, while opponents of the ban worried that changing the charter could stifle business.
Supporters of the bans framed the votes as a defense of town life. One Trenton voter, with her nine-month-old son at the polls, said she wants him to grow up in a town without noise and air pollution. Another said she wants Trenton to stay a quality place for children, and wants its farmland and greenspace preserved for her grandchildren.
Why It Matters
Ohio is not a fringe case. The state already has more than 200 operating data centers, ranks fifth nationally for data center projects, and already counts 125 local moratoriums. State data put planned AI infrastructure investment in Ohio at up to 40 billion dollars by 2030, which means the votes land directly on the industry’s growth map.
The national picture points the same way. Voters faced 41 data-center measures across 10 states, and about two dozen restrictive measures passed, according to counts compiled from Ballotpedia returns. Only one result, in North Dakota, went the industry’s way. The pattern suggests local permission, not just power and capital, is now a binding constraint on the buildout.
Our read
Our read: this is the first election in which voters treated AI infrastructure as a local planning issue rather than a distant technology story. The margins matter as much as the outcomes. Bans passed with 80 percent in Trenton and more than 87 percent in Perry and Monroeville, numbers that cross party lines and give other towns a template.
For the builders, the practical consequence is delay and redesign. A 25-megawatt cap does not regulate a hyperscale campus; it excludes it. Companies will have to negotiate earlier, offer more on power, water and tax guarantees, or look to states and counties that still want them.
Ohio already hosts Meta’s completed first-phase supercluster, so the state is not closed to the industry. But new projects now face a voter veto, and the groups behind the charter amendments want a statewide ban on large data centers on next year’s ballot.
Background
The votes arrived alongside fresh signs that the buildout’s economics are tightening, with data-center revenue nearly doubling at AMD even as financing questions grow. What happens next in Ohio depends on certification, court challenges to the new charters, and whether developers renegotiate or relocate.
Source: Enquirer results roundup
0 Comments